Message-ID: <6765681.1075853170535.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 11:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: richard.sanders@enron.com
To: nmanne@susmangodfrey.com
Subject: Re: Beeson
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Richard B Sanders
X-To: nmanne@susmangodfrey.com @ ENRON
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Oct2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsanders.nsf

Lets talk about this.Do you have time for a sandwich Mon, Tues, or Wed of 
next week?




nmanne@susmangodfrey.com on 04/25/2000 05:53:46 PM
To: Richard.B.Sanders@Enron.com
cc:  
Subject: Beeson


CFP and I discussed my question, posed
to both you and her, about whether I
needed to involve others at my firm in this
case.  Her view was no, and I do not
disagree.  But I did not hear from you
and, still scarred from my prior error in
assuming that CFP spoke for Enron, I
would like to have your view.  So, again: do you want Geoff Harrison, Vineet 
Bhatia
or Steve Susman involved in this case? Right now it is being handled by a
Bracewell team, a V&E team, and me as
the sole SG contributor.  That's fine with
me if it is with you and JVD.

